Latest post 10-05-2008 11:34 PM by Sander Berkouwer. 1 replies.
  • 10-05-2008 3:10 AM

    • ft65
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 07-21-2008
    • Posts 6
    • Points 105

    Get it now for free

    Just downloaded the free version of Hyper-V core. Smile available on Microsoft's web site. It's a whopping 1 GB download, but on a 4 MB ADSL it took less than 45 minutes to download, and I got it on the first attempt wow! I installed it on a £500 Intel Duo 2 T7250 CPU laptop (see later). Following Microsoft's "Hyper-V Server 2008 Setup and Configuration Tool Guide" was pretty straight forward. My only trouble was getting the network card going, much the same as when I installed Win2008 full version on the same laptop. I fixed it with a bit of regedit jiggery pokery.

    If you are thinking of installing Win2008 (Hyper-V) Core, I strongly recommend installing the full version of Win2008, to see if you have any hardware issues. My laptop had a Via Fast Ethernet NIC, and it had the same problem as the Dell Broadcom Nic "IPv4 Large Send Offload" (see http://hypervoria.com/hyper-v/network-issues-with-windows-server-2008-rdp-and-vs-hyper-v-on-dell-servers.aspx) Installing Win2008 in evaluation mode (using any disk, but not inserting the key) allows 30 days eval. (see  http://hypervoria.com/forums/t/136.aspx). With a full install, it is easy to fiddle with configuration such as adjusting the advanced NIC settings, especially disabling TCP Offload (to get the NIC passing data!).

    With Core, fiddling with the NIC settings is only possible through the registry (Regedit or Regedt32). The trick with Core, is to check and change the NIC settings directly in the registry (once you've figured out which ones). For me it was LSOv1Pv4 = 0 (and a reboot), to disable "IPv4 Large Send Offload".

    Now I just need to find a Vista PC, and install the Hyper-V admin tools!

    My "love / hate relationship" with Microsoft, has taken a turn for the better!

    I am still unconvinced that Microsoft has taken the the right step with Vista / Win2008, AND Hyper-V, I think the much leaner Win2k3, is a superior product. Vista / Win2008 is muddled, overcomplicated, and bloated, I just hate it. I also fail to see Hyper-V's advantages over Virtual Server 2005; but I guess, working in IT, I have to keep up with the latest offerings.

    Well done Microsoft for giving away VM software free, though I do feel some sympathy towards VMware. I really do hope that VMware can keep in front of Microsoft, with competition, we should see some real inovation.

     

     

    • Post Points: 20
  • 10-05-2008 11:34 PM In reply to

    Re: Get it now for free

    ft65:

    I am still unconvinced that Microsoft has taken the the right step with Vista / Win2008, AND Hyper-V, I think the much leaner Win2k3, is a superior product. Vista / Win2008 is muddled, overcomplicated, and bloated, I just hate it. I also fail to see Hyper-V's advantages over Virtual Server 2005 

    A Server Core installation of Windows Server 2008 has the same disk and memory footprint as a Windows Server 2003 install with Service Pack 2 installed. For this footprint you get a product that comes with a new network stack (fully supporting IPv6), offers superior security (smallest attack surface of any NT flavor, two-way firewall), less reboots for patches ("HotPatching") and GlobalNames zones (replacing WINS).

    Comparisons between Hyper-V Virtual Machines (with Integration Components installed) and Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1 Virtual Machines (with Virtual Server additions installed) definitely show a huge performance difference, in favor of Hyper-V. (Example) Virtual Server (and Virtual PC) are still perfect when you want to run old Windows (Pre-Windows 2000) and MS-DOS based Virtual Machines in an unsupported manner. Besides, I'll choose the Hyper-V Manager any time over Virtual Servers webconsole...

    • Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (2 items) | RSS
2008 (C) Steven Bink, Bink.nu BV
Microsoft and Microsoft Logo’s are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation.